Freezing Electricity Costs
Air conditioning requires lots of electricity to keep things cool when temperatures go up. While there’s no practical way to cut air conditioning electrical consumption in half, there is a way to substantially cut the cost. There are even financial incentives to help commercial and industrial consumers take advantage of the lower electricity prices. What’s behind this fantastic opportunity? Ice.
Electricity Costs
Utilities are required to meet all demands for electricity, all the time. On the hottest summer days, a perfect storm of conditions drives the cost of supplying electricity to astronomical heights:
Thermal Energy Storage (TES)
As shown in Figure 1, the peak demand for electricity (“on-peak”) occurs between 8 AM and 8 PM. To reduce the costs of meeting peak demand, utilities look for ways to shift portions of the on-peak demand to off-peak (8 PM to 8 AM) when they have idle generating capacity. A common way to effectively shift electrical loads is to store energy during off-peak times and use that energy during on-peak periods. Very large-scale batteries are being developed for this purpose, however Thermal Energy Storage (TES) systems are already a well-developed and widely used solution for load shifting.
TES systems shift electrical loads by storing energy in the form of ice to supplement the operation of chillers used in commercial air conditioning systems. To shift electricity use, a TES system runs a chiller overnight to make and store ice using off-peak electricity. Ice stored in the TES system is then used on-peak to minimize chiller operation and associated electricity consumption.
TES systems utilizing chilled water are mechanically simpler compared to ice systems. However, the primary advantage of ice TES is the latent heat of fusion (changing water to ice) which makes ice storage volume (ft3/ton-hour) roughly five times less than that of water. Needing much less working fluid, ice TES systems are small and relatively light enough to mount on rooftops while chilled water TES have very large footprints and are extremely heavy.
In addition to shifting electrical demand to off-peak hours, TES efficiency benefits compared to operating air conditioning chillers during on-peak hours:
- High temperatures swell the need for air conditioning which creates very high summer peak demand
- Summer peak demand can be 25% or more higher than the annual average (Figure 1)
- Commercial buildings consume 37% of all electricity in the U.S. and 11.9% of that goes to air conditioning used almost exclusively in summer months
- Extra generating, transmission and distribution infrastructure is needed to meet the summer peak
- Much of the extra infrastructure operates less than 10 hours per year
- As temperatures increase, the efficiency of generating and delivering electricity and air conditioning systems decrease substantially
- “Peaking units” are often the least environmentally friendly and efficient generators
- Ultimately, meeting summer peaks cost utilities hundreds of millions to billions of dollars
Thermal Energy Storage (TES)
As shown in Figure 1, the peak demand for electricity (“on-peak”) occurs between 8 AM and 8 PM. To reduce the costs of meeting peak demand, utilities look for ways to shift portions of the on-peak demand to off-peak (8 PM to 8 AM) when they have idle generating capacity. A common way to effectively shift electrical loads is to store energy during off-peak times and use that energy during on-peak periods. Very large-scale batteries are being developed for this purpose, however Thermal Energy Storage (TES) systems are already a well-developed and widely used solution for load shifting.
TES systems shift electrical loads by storing energy in the form of ice to supplement the operation of chillers used in commercial air conditioning systems. To shift electricity use, a TES system runs a chiller overnight to make and store ice using off-peak electricity. Ice stored in the TES system is then used on-peak to minimize chiller operation and associated electricity consumption.
TES systems utilizing chilled water are mechanically simpler compared to ice systems. However, the primary advantage of ice TES is the latent heat of fusion (changing water to ice) which makes ice storage volume (ft3/ton-hour) roughly five times less than that of water. Needing much less working fluid, ice TES systems are small and relatively light enough to mount on rooftops while chilled water TES have very large footprints and are extremely heavy.
In addition to shifting electrical demand to off-peak hours, TES efficiency benefits compared to operating air conditioning chillers during on-peak hours:
- Making ice overnight when ambient air temperatures are lower is more efficient, especially for air-cooled chillers.
- TES ice systems recharging off-peak run at or near full load (rather than cycling) since the goal is making as much ice as possible.
- Smaller size air-handlers and associated power reductions may be possible in systems using low-temperature air distribution.
- Faster cooling under normal operation,
- Emergency cooling (with a backup generator) during blackouts, and
- Redundant cooling for chiller maintenance.